🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in other member states